LLM guidance moved simulated households toward broader participation in diversified equity funds.
Better questions lead to
better financial decisions.
FinPath turns an incomplete money question into a structured financial brief—then creates a practical plan and shows its assumptions.
The research behind FinPath
AI advice can help.
The question is the bottleneck.
A 2026 working paper by researchers at MIT and Stanford simulated the lifetime effects of financial guidance from GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash.
Most participants moved closer to established household-finance principles—but outcomes varied with the information and framing in their prompts.
Read the 86-page working paper ↗Structured “academic” prompts improved consumption smoothing and reduced reliance on simple heuristics.
Differences in questions and model responses compounded into 4–5% retirement-wealth gaps between groups.
The paper evaluates simulated adherence to advice—not real-world returns or a guarantee that LLM advice is correct. FinPath uses its findings as design evidence, not as an endorsement.
Designed around the evidence
Not another blank chat box.
Fill the gaps
We collect the facts people commonly leave out: cash flow, debt cost, time horizon, income stability, and risk behavior.
Normalize the question
Your words become a complete, neutral brief. Demographics never stand in for risk tolerance.
Generate and audit
The plan must expose assumptions, balance monthly cash flow, address shocks, diversify, and state a rebalancing rule.
Clarity before recommendations.